Why CRM Installations fail
Walter Janowski said too many corporate enterprises
continue to take an ad-hoc approach to CRM that doesn't
involve key departments or take into consideration
customer expectations. - Shane Schick, Issue: Sept
21, 2001 Computing Canada
What we find is that most companies don't look at
CRM as an actual project, but more of a task that
can be done in a day, or something that can be done
on the cheap. This is the biggest mistake a company
can make. A company wouldn't implement a CRM like
SIEBEL in a day and/or by themselves. A proper GoldMine
implementation takes planning, meetings to gather
valuable information, and coordination between sales,
IT and other departments.
Other things need to be taken into consideration
such as customizations, existing data to import,
synchronization settings, and security. Just recently
here in Atlanta, a disgruntled ex-employee was arrested
in an FBI sting for trying to sell his ex-employers
entire customer database for $20,000. Yet, we see
self-installations left wide open for entire database
theft or deletion all the time.
Synchronization is another component that we see
critical mistakes being made. FrontRange requires
its partners to have various certifications including
one that focuses on synchronization configuration.
We see very talented certified network engineers
make multiple mistakes in the configuration of synchronization
that, in time, leads to corrupted data and potentially
software failure.
No implementation should be considered complete
until after all of the users have been trained properly
and are using the software; yet training is probably
one of the most overlooked stages of the project.
Statistics show that employees who are properly
trained are happier and more productive in their
jobs. Lack of training creates a larger learning
curve; slower implementation and almost a 100% guarantee
that they use the product incorrectly. This has a
direct adverse effect on the results that gave you
the reason to buy the product in the first place:
making it, for-the-most-part, worthless. Garbage
in, garbage out.
"The one thing worse than training your employees
and losing them, is not training and keeping them".
|